within the
power
of the magistrate to try. On this
Subject
၅
"
of the 3rd of Septemba last
addressed you in
my despatch
no.141.
last.
gre
I a gun with you
too in
thinking
that in
any
7
case the duties
Assistant magistrate should
not be entrusted to the
Clark, Nor can
Chief Clark,
9
allow that M. Arthur has
been treated otherwise than
equitably
or has
: any
valid
claim to increase of pay
19. In paragraph. 109. 9 report
then
the Getrenchment.com-
mittee recommend that if M-Shepherd be continued
oprial receiver,
As
be
given
he should
an additional allowance
at the rate
which Ishouldbet glad to receive
out an
of $50 a month. to cover the
Cost of all clerical assistance
assistasis
Such
656
thin
Other than what is borne by the bankrupt estate. If so allowance were granted, the Chief
pointsont Justice Supports that the fees Nors pay, able to the
Official receiver
would have to be transferred to the garment.
This matter, which has already
been referred
to in the fifth
deshatch
paragraph of my declary
No 20 the 20 q
No requires separate
and report
last
considuation
I am not clear
(sarly date) that Mi Shepherd should be
Compensated for the loss
these fees
as it was
apparently
not intended that the should
receive them, and I understand that ander the old ordinance
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.